Saturday’s Telegraph readers of the Property section will need to take a large pinch of salt when reading an article written by the Telegraph’s supposed awarding writer, Ian Cowie.
Mr Cowie suggests that last week’s Budget is on the whole beneficial to home owners. This may well be true, but what isn’t true ,is what he has to say about the new powers the Localism Bill will give to those home owners.
He claims that, ‘……..the Localism Bill should give residents greater power to decide whether or not more fields and woods are bricked over to build new housing,……’ .
Now I’m not sure what this chap got his award for, but it wasn’t for demonstrating any expert knowledge of what the government’s ambitions are when it comes to the planning system in this country – ambitions that don’t involve preventing house building!
Ian Cowie appears to have missed the bit in the Budget about the planning system being changed to encourage economic growth. That encouragement will take the form of, as various government minister have taken pleasure in saying over the last 12 months, simplifying the system so as to make it far easier to build things.
So, whilst localism will give local people a say on the types of development that take place in their area, it will definately not give them any powers to prevent development if it has already been included in the council’s development plan for the area. Nor will communites be able to stop development, and this is the worrying bit, because it has yet to be defined in any useable way, if it is considered sustainable.
Don’t just take my word for it, read the Royal Town Planning Institute’s (RTPI) response to the budget. http://www.rtpi.org.uk/item/4477/23/5/3